GENERAL RULES ON RESPONSIBILITY

Mirjana Knežević

Authors

Mirjana Knežević The Faculty of Economy of the University of Kragujevac

Keywords:

general rules on responsibility, responsibility of the transporter

Abstract

Having in mind the rule of subsidiar application of civil law when there are no specific legal provisions for certain types of transportation, having in mind that regarding the amount of reimbursement transporter is responsible according to the same programs like other persons, we have exposed in thispaper basic regulations of the civil legal responsibilirv forthe damages.
The problem of the responsibilirv of the transporter becomes in time one of the most interpreted legal questions, because the users of transportation want to know evervthing about legal consequences of traffic accidents, rights that would have members of their families in case of their death or their own reimbursement in case that they survive accident.
When we speak about responsibility of the transporter for death and injury of the passengers, we speak about rights of the passengers or their relatives for the financial reimbursement or non financial reimbursement. Loss of life and damaged health can not be financialv compensated, but the responsibilitv of the transporter for the death and body injuries of the passengers gives legal protection of the passengers and shovvs it’s legal meaning.
Extraordinary efforts are conducted in the area of unification of rules regarding responsibility of the transporter, but unification of the rules on responsibilities of the transporter for the damages on goods was much earlier and was more succesfully performed then the responsibility of the transporter for death and body injuries of the passengers.

References

Adolfo Ručnof, Tumač Obćemu austrijskomu građanskomu zakoniku, knjiga II, Knjižara Lav. Hertmana, Zagreb, 1891.

Andre Lucas, Pierre Catala, Code Civil, 2001.

Babić, I., Ugovorna i vanugovorna odgovornost za štetu – pojam i razgraničenje, Zbornik radova sa savetovanja održanog na Zlatiboru od 18. 2.-20. 2. 2004. godine, Novi Sad, 2004.

Cigoj, S., Građanska odgovornost, odrednica u enciklopediji imovinskog prava i prava udruženog rada, tom I, NIU Službeni list SFRJ, Beograd, 1997.

Grabovec, I., Temelj odgovornosti u Zakonu o pomorskoj i unutrašnjoj plovidbi, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 1978, str. 37.

Halfina, R., Dogovornaja otvetstvenost po sovjetskom grdanskom pravu, Zbornik radova o stranom i uporednom pravu, sveska 4, Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, 1966.

Vuković, M., Obvezno pravo, Zagreb, Knjiga 1, 1964.

Jankovec, I., Ugovorna odgovornost, Poslovna politika, Beograd, 1993.

Jakaša, B., Udžbenik plovidbenog prava, Zagreb, 1979.

Jakaša, B., Kopneno i zračno saobraćajno pravo, Zagreb, 1969..

Krulj, V., Vanugovorna (deliktna) i ugovorna odgovornost, Arhiv za pravne i društvena nauke, br. 2-3/59.

Klarić, P., Pravna osnova odgovornosti za štetu, Zagreb, Cakovec, 1983.

Perić, B., O odnosu između kontraktualne i deliktne odgovornosti, Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, knjiga IX, treće kolo, 1953.

Perović, S., Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima, II Knjiga, Beograd, 1995, str. 1190.

Rosko Paund, Jurisprudencija, knjiga II, Službeni list SRJ, Beograd - CID, Podgorica, 2000.

Stojčević, O., Rimsko obligaciono pravo, Zavod za izdavanje udžbenika, Beograd, 1960.

Stanojević, O., Rimsko pravo, Pravni fakultet, Beograd, Dosije, 1997.

Šulejić, P., Pravo osiguranja, Beograd, 1980.

Toroman, M., Jedinstvo i dualitet ugovorne i deliktne odgovornosti i mogućnost njihove komulacije, Zbornik radova o stranom i uporednom pravu, Institut za uporedno pravo, Beograd, broj 2/63, str. 160. i 161.Mr