OVERRIDING MANDATORY RULES IN THE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW

Authors

  • Jelena Stojšić Dabetić The Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary, The University of Business Academy

Abstract

Overriding mandatory rules fall within the context of the unilateralism in the International Private Law. This implies that there are certain norms outside the corpus of the conflict of laws norms applying to the legal situations with a foreign element. These norms can be a part of the forum state law, applicable law (lex causae) or the third law with which the legal relation in question has a particular, close relationship. They can also be of a supranational character. Overriding mandatory rules represent mandatory norms which impose their own pertinence and apply to all legal relations related to the country whose law they are a part of. In this sense, they are aimed at protecting the economic, commercial and financial order of the state. They are applied regardless of the guidance of the conflict of laws rules. These norms are, by their very nature, and to a certain degree concerning their content, similar to the institution of public order in the international private law. They are particularly important in the sphere of contractual relations, where their application also gets a supra-national dimension, bearing in mind the membership of a particular state to the European Union. Having in mind its specificity and growing importance in the context of inter-state economic activity, it is useful to devote a special and additional attention to these norms. To this end, this work will be dedicated to the most important theoretical and practical aspects of this institute of the international private law. Starting from the general framework of unilateralism, as a way of regulating the civil law relations with a foreign element, over the concept, characteristics and effect of overriding mandatory rules in the national and communitarian international private law, to the practical aspects of their application in contractual and other private legal relations. Also, there will be pointed out a distinction referring to the institution of public order in the international private law, as well as to the special significance of overriding mandatory rules arising from the EU legal order.

References

Arblade case, joined cases C-396/96 and C-376/96, 1999, ECR I, 8453, Rec. 30

Dong, J., (2016). On the Internationally Mandatory Rules of the PRC, Cambridge Journal of China Studies, 11 (2), pp. 55-68

Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts, Hague Conference on Private International Law, Council on General Affairs and Policy of The Conference, Conclusions and Recommendations, adopted by the Council, April 8-10, 2014

Joined cases C509/09 & C161/10, eDAte Advertising and Martinez, 2011, E.C.R.I-10269, par. 65.

Kramer, X., (2017). EU Overriding Mandatory Law and the Applicable Law on the Substance in International Commercial Arbitration, F. Ferrari (Ed.), The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration, New York, pp. 285-316

Kebede, A., Kassim, S., (2009). Conflict of Laws Teaching Material, Justice and Legal System Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethoipia, pp. 111-114

Kitić, D., (2017), Međunarodno privatno pravo, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union u Beogradu, JP Službeni glasnik

Knežević, G., Pavić, V., (2007). Collection of Papers European Judicial Area

Regulation EC No. 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I), O.J. 2008 L 177

Regulation No. 864/2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II), O.J. 2007 L 199/40

Republik Griechenland v Grigorios Nikiforidis, C-135/15, 2016, ECLI: EU:C:2016:774, par. 45,47

Stanivuković, M., Živković, M., (2006). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Beograd, JP Službeni glasnik

Stanivuković, M., (2017). Lično ime deteta u srpskom međunarodnom privatnom pravu, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 51 (1), str. 23-43

United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (UNAMAR) NV v Navigation Maritime Bulgare, C-184/12, 2013, ECLI: EU:C:2013:663, par. 49

Varadi, T. et al. (2007). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, JP SLužbeni glasnik

Van Bochove, L. M., (2014). Overriding Mmandatory Rules as s Vehicle for Weaker Party Protection in European Private International Law, Erasmus Law Review, 7 (3), pp. 147-156

Zakon o rešavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalja, Sl. list SFRJ, br. 43/82 i 72/82 - ispr., Sl. list SRJ, br. 46/96 i Sl. glasnik RS, br. 46/206 - dr. zakon

Zakon o osnovama svojinskopravnih odnosa, Sl. list SFRJ, br. 6/80 i 36/90, Sl. list SRJ, br. 29/96 i Sl. glasnik RS, br. 115/05 - dr. zakon

Zakon o ulaganjima, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 89/15

Zakon o spoljnotrgovinskom poslovanju, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 36/09, 36/11 - dr. zakon, 88/11 i 89/15 - dr. zakon

Zakon o deviznom poslovanju, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 62/06, 31/11, 119/12, 139/14 i 30/18

Zakon o zaštiti konkurencije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 51/09 i 95/13

Porodični zakon, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 18/05, 72/11 - dr. zakon i 6/15

Zakon o matičnim knjigama, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 20/09, 145/14 i 47/18

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Stojšić Dabetić, J. (2018). OVERRIDING MANDATORY RULES IN THE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 35(4-6), 45–60. Retrieved from https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/53