Аnonymous witness statements in the European Court of Human Rights – Is it possible to achieve the right to a fair trial?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2403170GKeywords:
anonymous witnesses, European Court of Human Rights, right to a fair trial, anonymous witness statements, counterbalancing mechanismAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to stimulate reflection on the use and significance of anonymous witness statements in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis of selected leading cases in this area will provide an overview of the development of European judicial practice regarding the fact that the right of the defense is seriously compromised when such statements are accepted in criminal proceedings. A significant number of judgments represent a setback, particularly concerning the realization of the right to confrontation, which is characteristic of cases involving statements from anonymous witnesses. In such cases, the question arises as to what counterbalancing mechanisms could compensate for the denial of the accused’s rights when the identity of the individual providing incriminating statements is concealed. The statements of anonymous witnesses have, in a way, influenced the practice of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the establishment of a legal standard that has gradually taken on the role of a corrective mechanism, maintaining the balance between opposing parties. The question is whether such a corrective mechanism for the procedural protection of anonymous witnesses can preserve the interests of both sides.
References
Balsamo, A. (2006). Testimonianze anonime ed effettività delle garanzie sul terreno del diritto vivente nel processo di integrazione giuridica europea, Cassazione penale, 46(9), pp. 3007–3015
Brkić, S. (2006). Anonimni svedoci u kontinentalnom pravu [Anonymous witness in the continental law] Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 40(3), pp. 289–314
Delibasić V. (2016). Prikriveni islednik, [Undercover agent] Nauka, bezbednost, policija, no.1 pp.81-98
Filipović, N., & Koprivica, A. (2022). Prikriveni islednik u određenim zemljama kontinentalno evropskog Sistema [The undercover investigators in the specific countries of the european contitental legal system]. Pravo – teorija i praksa 39(2), pp.108–121
Golubović, B. (2021). Podela svedoka u krivičnom postupku [Divison of the witnesses in the criminal proceedings]. Nacionalna bezbednost, 13, pp.83–102
Ilić, G. (2012). Ostećeni i standardi ljudskih prava u krivičnom postupku [Injured party and the standards of human rights in the criminal proceedings] Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 60(2), pp. 135–161
Ilić, I., & Knežević, S. (2020). Obim člana 6 Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima – doprinos praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava [Scope of article 6 of the European Convention on human rights – contribution of the European court of human rights practice]. Balkan social science rewiev, 16, pp. 39–55
Karas, Ž. (2012). Neka dokazna pitanja o razgovoru privatnog istražitelja s osumnjičenikom [Some evidential issues on covert questioning by undercover agents]. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 19(1), pp. 127–160
Lazarov, Z. (2018). Zaštita svedoka u krivičnom postupku, doktorska disertacija [Witness protection in the criminal procedure, doctoral dissertation]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu
Lonati, S. (2018). Anonymous witness evidence before European court of human rights: Is it still possible to speak about fair trial? European criminal law review, 8(1), pp. 116–142
Pajčić, M. (2005). Ugroženi svjedoci u kaznenom postupku [Threatened witnesses in criminal procedure]. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 12(1), pp. 33–62
Recommendation No. R (97) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states concerning intimidation of witnesses and the rights of the defence (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 10 September 1997 at the 600th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)
Škulić, M. (2005). Prikriveni islednik – zakonsko rešenje i neka sporna pitanja [Undercover agent – legal solution and some controversial questions) Bezbednost, 47(3), pp. 373–397
Turanjanin, V. (2021). Anonimni svedoci i zaštita ljudskih prava[Anonymous witness and the protection of human rights] In: Soković, S. (ur.), Usklađivanje pravnog sistema Srbije sa standardima Evropske unije, knj. 9, [Harmonization of the legal system of Serbia with the standards of the European Union, vol. 9] (pp. 277–296). Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet
Vasiljević, T., & Grubač, M. (2011). Komentar Zakona o krivičnom postupku [Commentary of the criminal procedure code]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik
Vogliotti, M. (1998). La logica floue della Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo tra tutela del testimone e salvaguardia del contraddittorio: il caso delle “testimonianze anonime” [The fluid logic of the European Court of Human Rights between witness protection and cross-examination protection: the case of “anonymous testimonies”]. Giurisprudenza italiana, pp. 851–860
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bojana Golubović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.