ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: CENTRAL CHARACTERISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES
Abstract
The very character of business relations and especially that of international commercial and trade relations entails a host of advantages of arbitration as a form of dispute resolution in this area over the traditional court procedures. Today, in the context of intensive internationalisation of national economies and a globalised scope of operations of single private economic actors, arbitration has quickly gained in importance and taken over a dominant role in resolving disputes arising in international business relations. At the same time, the role of traditional national courts has been wanning. It is therefore necessary to understand the exact form and extent of international commercial arbitration, its advantages and disadvantages as well as its position vis a vis the national and international law. The goal of this paper is to offer a comprehensive overview of legal aspects of international commercial arbitration: its development, legal nature, theoretical foundations and the place it occupies in the international law. The discussion focuses on the advantages as well as disadvantages of international commercial arbitration and emphasizes the task of promoting and improving this institution in order to support growing needs for effective dispute resolution in the area of international commercial relations. In that sense, it is especially important to broaden and further the body of work dealing with the notion and definition of arbitration institutions, as well as that of arbitration law in general, and especially the relevant procedural law.
References
Bardoš, Varadi, Knežević, (2001). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Novi Sad, Forum
Bilbija, V., (2001). Priznanje i izvršenje stranih arbitražnih odluka, Pravo – teorija i praksa 18(12), str. 43–56
Carić, S., (1996). Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža u SR Nemačkoj, Pravo – teorija i praksa 13(1–2), str. 21–24
Carić, Šogorov, Vilus, Đurđev, (2000). Međunarodno pravo, Novi Sad
čolić, B., (2006). Novi Zakon o arbitaži, arbitražni sud, postupci i odluke, Pravo i privreda 43(8–12), str. 22–37
Cukavac, M., (2000). Trgovinski spor sa elementom inostranosti kao uslov za uspostavljanje nadležnosti međunarodne trgovinske arbitraže, Pravo i privreda 37(1–2), str. 26–36
David, R., (1982). L’arbitrage dans le commerce international, Economica, Pariz, 1982.
Domke, (1959). Arbitration of State-trading Relations, Symposium-State Trading: Part I
Domke, (1959). Konferencija Ujedinjenih Nacija o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži
Dukić Mijatović, M., (2010). Priznanje i izvršenje arbitražnih odluka – Osvrt na izmene i dopune UNCITRAL-ovog Model Zakona o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži, Pravna riječ: časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu 2(5), str. 173–180
Dukić Mijatović, M., (2011). Položaj arbitra u arbitražnom postupkukomparativni pregled, Strani pravni život (1), str. 217–229
Đajić, S., (2011). Vremenska nadležnost međunarodnih sudova i arbitraža, Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke (135), str. 211–230
Đurović, R., Lopičić, P., (1992). Spoljnotrgovinska arbitraža pri privrednoj komori Jugoslavije i arbitražna praksa, Pravo – teorija i praksa 9(5– 7), str. 43–51
Filsom, Gordon, Spanogle jr., (1998). Međunarodni trgovački poslovi (u sažetom obliku), Rijeka, Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Rijeci
Keča, R., (1999). Arbitražni sporazum, Novi Sad, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu – Pravni fakultet
Jarrosson, Ch., (1987). La notion d’arbitrage, Pariz, LGDJ
Jezdić, M., (1979). Međunarodno privatno pravo II, Beograd, Naučna knjiga
Jovičić, K., (2008). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Strani pravni život (3), str. 99–121
Jovičić, K., (2003). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža u pravu Japana, Strani pravni život (1), str. 131–145
Lowenfeld, (1992). International litigation and arbitration, Amerikan Casebook Series, West Group
Lowenfeld, (1993). International litigation and arbitration – Selected Treaties, Statutes and Rules, Amerikan Casebook Series, West Publishing Co.
Mitić, B., (2002). Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža-značaj u rešavanju međunarodnih poslovnih sporova, Tržište, novac, kapital 34(1), str. 42–53
Mitrović, M. Dobrosav, (1996). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Strana pravila i propisi, Beograd
Mitrović, (1997). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža danas, Međunarodna privredna arbitraža – stanje i perspektive, Beograd
Pak, M., (1989). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Beograd, Naučna knjiga
Perović, J., (1997). Punovažnost ugovora o arbitraži, Međunarodna privredna arbitraža – stanje i perspektive, Beograd
Perović, J., (1997). Sporne odredbe kompromisorne klauzule, Pravni život (12), str. 321–334
Petrović, M., (2001). Imperativni propisi i međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Pravo i privreda 38(5–8), str. 811–820
Petrović, M., (2001). Opšti principi prava i međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Pravni život 50(12), str. 247–258
Petrović, M., (1996). Lex mercatoria i međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Pravo – teorija i praksa 13(3–4), str. 58–72
Redžović, N., (2011). Arbitraža, Poslovna politika 40(3–4), str. 40–44
Redfern, Hunter, (1999). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, London, Sweet&Maxwell
Rubellin-Devichi, J., L’arbitrage. Nature juridique. Droit interne et droit international privé, LGDJ
Salma, M., Salma, J., (1998). Usaglašavanje nacionalnih zakonodavstava o arbitražama sa međunarodnim modelima zakona, Pravo – teorija i praksa 15(1), str. 35–48
Stanković, Starović, Keča, Petrušić, (2002). Arbitražno procesno pravo, Niš, Udruženje za građansko procesno i arbitražno parvo
Triva, Poznić, Vorgić, Varadi, (1973). Arbitražno rešavanje sporova, Novi Sad
Triva, (1970). Arbitražna klauzula u općim uvjetima poslovanja, iz dela Opći uvjeti poslovanja u međunarodnoj i unutrašnjoj trgovini, Zagreb, Informator
Varadi, Barcelo, von Mehren, (1999). International Commercial Arbitration, Amerikan Cesebook Series, West Group
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






