ACTIVE LEGITIMIZATION FOR THE TERMINATION OF A LIFELONG SUPPORT CONTRACT

Nemanja Kovačević

Authors

Nemanja Kovačević The Faculty of Law, Kragujevac

Abstract

The author reviews the issue of the termination of a lifelong support contract from the perspective of the persons who can legitimately seek such a termination. The topic of this paper work is the key issue in domain of the termination of the most significant succession contract in our legislation which is discussed through the analysis of the rights of three parties who may seek the termination of such a contract: the contractor, that is the party seeking the support, the party providing the support and the party who is the contractor’s successor. The focus is put on the question who can appear as a plaintiff in a civil suit related to the termination of the lifelong contract. At the beginning of the work, the author points to the main reasons for the termination of lifelong contracts, while the entire work and the disputable issues are supported by the examples and opinions from the court practice and legal doctrine.

References

Antić, O., Balinovac, Z., (1996). Komentar Zakona o nasleđivanju, Beograd, Nomos

Nikolić, Đ., (2007). Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, Projuris

Radbruh, G., (1980). Filozofija prava, Beograd

Radišić, J., (2004). Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, Nomos

Misita, N., (1977). O raskidu ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju zbog neizvršenja. Godišnjak Pravnog fakulteta u Sarajevu, (25)

Panov, S., Antić, O., (2007). Porodično pravo & Nasledno pravo, Beograd

Svorcan, S., (2004). Komentar Zakona o nasleđivanju Srbije sa sudskom praksom, Kragujevac, Pravni fakultet

Svorcan, S., (1988). Raskid ugovora o doživotnom izdržavanju, Beograd, Savremena administracija

Subotić- Konstantinović, N., (1968). Ugovor o doživotnom izdržavanju, Beograd

Kreč M., Pavić, Đ., (1964). Komentar Zakona o nasleđivanju, Zagreb

Krsmanović, T., (2002). Aktuelna sudska praksa iz građansko-materijalnog prava, Beograd

Odluke Apelacionog suda u Kragujevcu (Gž.1477/10, Gž.1842/10, Gž.2607/11) i Vrhovnog kasacionog suda (Rev.1825/10) su komentarisane na osnovu neposrednog uvida u dokumentaciju pisarnice Apelacionog suda u Kragujevcu.