THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SCHOOL OF NATURAL LAW AND KELSEN’S NORMATIVE SCHOOL OF LAW

Authors

  • Zdravko Jež The associate professor at the Faculty of Law of the non-state University of Business Academy in Novi Sad
  • Borivoje Dunđerski The assistant of the head of the City management of town planning and housing jobs of Novi Sad

Keywords:

pre-norm, intellect-mind, natural law, metaphysics, human’s rights, human’s freedoms, scholasticism, social interest, positive law, Socrates, Kelsen, state, normativeness

Abstract

The School of natural law and Kelsen’s normative theory of law have taken an important place in the whole history of theory of law. However, the School of natural law has lasted since the 5th century B. C., and Kelsen’s normative theory has lasted for more than a half a century (since the forties of the last century).

The main characteristic of the School of natural law is in the fact that it finds its source in a human’s mind as a natural substance whose characteristics are basic and universal human’s rights such as the right of life, the right of freedom, the right of human’s dignity as well as the right of property and people’s equality by birth.

But, Kelsen’s normative theory finds the source of the whole law in a prenorm, i. e. a metaphysical norm by which there are defined both the human’s very nature and the essence of the state itself.

However, both the School of natural law and Kelsen’s normative theory, each in its own way, pointed at certain imperfection of positive law which was mainly based on interest-political basis. It is known that natural law interprets the concept of law in an intellectual-rational and natural way without interest-political and ideological elements. On the other side, Kelsen’s normative theory keeps and protects law from ideological-political influence through the closed system of pure law based on the pre-norm and having no support in a natural and social reality.

References

Ruso, Ž. Ž.: Društveni ugovor. O poreklu i osnovama nejednakosti, među ljudima, Beograd, 1949.

Vukadinović, G.: Žan Žak Ruso i prirodno pravo, Novi Sad, 1993.

Bloh, E.: Prirodno pravo i ljudsko dostojanstvo, Beograd, 1977.

Čavoški, K.: Mogućnost slobode i demokratije, Beograd 1981.

Đurić, M.: Ideje prirodnog prava kod grčkih sofista, Beograd, 1958.

Kant, I.: Um i sloboda, Beograd, 1974.

Metalko, J.: Evolucija priorodnog pravne ideje i neki njeni savremeni aspekti, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta, Zagreb, br. 1/1967.

Hans Kelzen: Čista teorija prava: uvod u problematiku pravne nauke, Pravni fakultet, Centar za publikacije, Beograd, 1998.

Hans Kelzen: Opšta teorija države i prava, Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke, Beograd, 1951.

Ljubomir Tadić: Filozofija prava, Enciklopedija filozofskih disciplina, Naprijed, Zagreb, 1983.

Downloads

Published

2010-04-30

How to Cite

Jež, Z., & Dunđerski, B. (2010). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SCHOOL OF NATURAL LAW AND KELSEN’S NORMATIVE SCHOOL OF LAW. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 27(3-4), 38–45. Retrieved from https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/289

Issue

Section

Original scientific work