INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION – A NECESSARY METHOD OF RESOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL DISPUTES WITH A FOREIGN ELEMENT WITHIN THE FRAME OF LEGAL ORDER IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Authors

  • Ilija Zinaić LLM Judge assistant at the Commercial court in Subotica
  • Slobodan Vojinović A graduated economist, The retired manager of the Regional Chamber of commerce – the administrative district of northern Bačka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1904059Z

Keywords:

business, foreign element, economic dispute, international arbitration, legal order

Abstract

One of the basic rights of any person, whether an individual or business entity, is the right to achieve an adequate protection of its violated rights, in front of any state or non-state institution, independently and impartially. However, besides the very need for justice to be satisfied, the efficiency of the process resulting in its satisfaction is also of a great importance. It is not the same whether the establishment of the situation prior to the appearance of the unlawfulness will come within a reasonable time, or within a certain period, which, due to the length of the proceedings, only leads to the omission of justice and fairness. Precisely, it is the efficiency itself which determins the choice of the institution where the participants of the eventual future or emerging disputes will realize their own rights, since the very length of the proceedings, in addition to the uncertainty, can contribute to the development of negative consequences of the unlawfulness more seriously (the greater damage, losses in business, distortion of reputation, etc.). In that sense, the quickness of the process is especially important for business entities regarding the fact that the essence of their existence is a profit gained through the performance of their registered economic activities. Especially favorable are global economic flows, which open up a wide space in terms of the exchange of goods, services and capital outside the borders of the countries that business entities belong to, since the countries themselves are becoming more and more frequent participants of these flows. However, a preexisted harmonious relationship can be easily disturbed with the emergence of business disputes, that cannot be solved by the mentioned agreement. Then, the ruling legal systems, to which the state and business entities belong, become particularly prominent, in order to provide the answers to questions concerning the jurisdiction of the institutions for resolving the dispute, and also the rights that should be applied to the resolution regarding the specific legal nature of the relationship. In situations such as this one, where the laws of the free market predominate, it is clearly pointed out that there is a need for a completely special mechanism in the form of permanent or ad hoc arbitration tribunals, with the state courts competent to resolve economic disputes dominated by the element of foreign affairs. The need for such mechanisms is reflected in the fact that the rights and interests of business entities being violated during an international business cooperation would be satisfied through a “less formal” and more efficient procedure. Therefore, the international arbitration, as a special type of non-state tribunal, is of exceptional importance for economic disputes with a foreign element, if it was envisaged by the agreement between business entities.*

References

Arbitražna pravila Komisije ujedinjenih nacija za međunarodno trgovnisko pravo (UNCITRAL) pred Stalnom arbitražom pri Privrednoj komori Srbije, Aneks I, Sl. glasnik rS, broj 101/2016

Dukić Mijatović M. (2011). Korporativno upravljanje i kompanijsko pravo Republike Srbije. Pravo – teorija i praksa 28 (1-3), str. 15-22

Janićijević, D. (2005). Arbitražni sporazum u savremenom međunarodnom arbitražnom pravu. Pravni život, 54 (11), str. 717-733

Krvavac, M., (2014). Prorogacija međunarodne sudske nadležnosti. Pravo i privreda. 51 (7-9), str. 423-433

Međunarodni savet za trgovinsku arbitražu (2011), preveli: Ristić, B. i Galić, N. Vodič Međunarodnog saveta za trgovinsku arbitražu (iKKA) za tumačenje nјujorške konvencije iz 1958. godine – Priručnik za sudije, Beograd

Model-zakon UNCITRAL-a o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži (Dokument Ujedinjenih nacija A/40/17, Aneks I, koji je prihvatila Komisija Ujedinjenih nacija za međunarodno trgovinsko parvo 21.06.1985, godine sa izmenama od 2006. godine, izdanje, Stanivuković, M. (2013). Međunarodna arbitraža, Beograd, JP Službeni glasnik

Odluka o popisu pravnih osoba od posebnog državnog interesa (2018, Novembar 28). Urednički pročišćen tekst, narodne novine, broj 144/10, 16/14, 55/15 i 105/15. Preuzeto sa: http://www.propisi.hr/print.php?id=9726.

Odluka Vlade Republike Srbije o obrazovanju komisije za razmatranje spornih odnosa koji mogu biti predmet pred međunarodnim arbitražama u kojima bi Republika Srbija bila tužena, Sl. gl. RS br. 83/17, koja je na snazi od 23.09.2017. godine

Pravilnik o stalnoj arbitraži pri Privrednoj komori Srbije, Sl. glasnik. RS, br. 101/16

Privredni apelacioni sud, rešenje Pvž.175/2010(2) od 25.03.2010. godine – Bilten sudske prakse privrednih sudova br.1/2010, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Privredni apelacioni sud, rešenje R4 St. 1011/2015 od 20.08.2015. godine – Bilten sudske praksa privrednih sudova br. 1/2016, Beograd, Privredni savetnik.

Privredni apelacioni sud, rešenje Pž. 4758/2012 od 31.10.2012. godine – Bilten sudske praksa privrednih sudova br. 4/2012, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Privredni apelacioni sud, rešenje Pž. 9730/2011(1) od 18.01.2012. godine, Dostupno u bazi Paragraf Lex

Privredni apelacioni sud, rešenje Pž. 6875/2013 od 25.09.2013. godine, Dostupno u bazi Paragraf Lex

Stanivuković, M. (1998). Merodavno pravo za arbitražni sporazum. Pravni život (12), (2018, Novembar 28) str. 309-325. Preuzeto sa: http://www.pf.uns.ac.rs/images/maja/17.pdf.

Stanivuković, M., (2013). Međunarodna arbitraža, Beograd, JP Službeni glasnik

Šćepanović, R. (2012). Prednosti i nedostaci savremene međunarodne trgovinske arbitraže: osnovne odlike i perspektive razvoja. Pravo – teorija i praksa 29 (1-3), str. 1-26

Troškovi postupka (2019, Januar 05). Preuzeto sa: http://www.stalnaarbitraza.rs/troskovi-postupka/

Unković, M., Stakić, B., (2011). Spoljnotrgovinsko i devizno poslovanje, drugo izmenjeno izdanje, Beograd, Univerzitet Singidunum – Poslovni fakultet Beograd

UNCITRAL (2018, Novembar 28). Preuzeto sa: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXII1&chapter=22&lang=en.

Uredba o ratifkaciji Evropske konvencije o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži sa završnim aktom specijalnog sastanka punomoćnka, Sl. SFrJMeđunarodni ugovori, br. 12/63

Vasilјević, M., (2001). Poslovno pravo, Beograd, Udruženje pravnika u privredi SR Jugoslavije

Vasilјević, M., (2017). Objektivna arbitrabilnost u kompanijskom pravu, Dvadeset peto savetovanje sudija Privrednih sudova Republike Srbije, radni Materijal ii, Beograd, Privredni apelacioni sud

Vasilјević, M., (2018) Zakon o privrednim društvima Srbije – može li bolјe?“ – Bilten sudske prakse privrednih sudova br.4/18, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Varadi, T., Bordaš, B., Knežević, G., Pavić, V., (2007). Međunarodno privatno parvo, osmo izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerzitet u Beogradu

Vrhovni kasacioni sud, rešenje Prev. 137/2014 od 11.12.2014. godine, Dostupno u bazi Paragraf Lex

Vrhovni kasacioni sud, rešenje Prev. 58/2016 od 06.10.2016. godine, Dostupno u bazi Paragraf Lex

Viši trgovinski sud, rešenje Pvž. 128/2006(1) od 09.03.2006. godine – Bilten sudske prakse trgovinskih sudova br.2/2006, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Viši trgovinski sud, rešenje Pvž. 128/2006(2) od 09.03.2006. godine – Bilten sudske prakse trgovinskih sudova br. 2/2006, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Viši trgovinski sud, rešenje Pž. 13602/2005(4) od 26.06.2006. godine – Bilten sudske prakse trgovinskih sudova br. 2/2006, Beograd, Privredni savetnik

Zakon o arbitraži, Sl. glasnik rS, broj 46/06

Zakon o ratifkaciji konvencije o priznanju i izvršenju stranih arbitražnih odluka, Sl. list SFRJ-Međunarodni ugovori, broj 11/81

Zakonom o prestanku važenja Zakona o privrednoj Komori Jugoslavije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 55/03

Zakon o privrednim komorama, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 112/15

Zakon o privrednim društvima, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 36/11, 99/11, 83/14 – dr. zakon, 5/15, 44/18 i 95/18

Zakon o potvrđivanju Sporazuma između Vlade Republike Srbije i Vlade Države Katar o uzajamnom podsticanju i zaštiti ulaganja, Sl. glasnik RS – Međunarodni ugovori, broj 2

Zakon o rešavanju sukoba zakona sa propisima drugih zemalјa, Sl. list SFRJ, br. 43/82 i 72/82 – ispr., Sl. list SrJ, br. 46/96 i Sl. glasnik RS, br. 46/06 – dr. Zakon

Zakon o uređenju sudova, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 116/08, 104/09, 101/10, 31/11 – dr. zakon, 78/11 – dr. zakon, 101/11, 101/13, 106/15, 40/15 – dr. zakon, 13/16, 108 /16, 113/17, 65/18 – odluka US, 87/18 i 88/18 – odluka US

Zakon o privatizaciji, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 83/14, 46/15, 112/15 i 20/16 – autentično tumačenje

Zakon o stečaju, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 104/09, 99/11 – dr. zakon, 71/12 – odluka US, 83/14, 113/17, 44/18 i 95/18

Zakon o parničnom postupku, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/11, 49/13 – odluka US, 74/13 – odluka US, 55/14 i 87/18

Downloads

Published

2019-06-30

How to Cite

Zinaić , I., & Vojinović , S. (2019). INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION – A NECESSARY METHOD OF RESOLUTION OF COMMERCIAL DISPUTES WITH A FOREIGN ELEMENT WITHIN THE FRAME OF LEGAL ORDER IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 36(4-6), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1904059Z