STRUCTURE AND RATIO LEGIS OF RETENTION RIGHT IN CONTEMPORARY CIVIL LAW

Aleksandra Pavićević

doi:10.5937/ptp2401132P

Authors

Aleksandra Pavićević University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, Kragujevac, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7915-6408

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2401132P

Keywords:

security right in rem, right of retention of possession and settlement, structure and ratio legis of Ius retentionis, self-protection

Abstract

The subject of this work is critical analysis of key segments of the civil law institute of retention, i.e., the right to retain the debtor’s property – primarily in positive Serbian law, but also in European regulations with the longest tradition of civil codes. Through the application of various scientific methods, particularly axiological and comparative law, the author analyzes and evaluates the following segments of Ius retentionis: definition, content and effect, forms, conditions for establishment, protection, and termination, with demarcation from related institutes. Commenting on various positive legislative solutions, the author also reflects on: the solutions of two previously drafted drafts that embody potential proposals for future Serbian civil law; as well as the model-rule DCFR, which constitutes part of the “soft” law of the EU, with which the domestic solution is useful to harmonize in the future, with the aim of determining the direction of further development of this institute. By providing explanation of some doctrinal and disputed retention issues (such as: permitted object, scope, legal nature), the author provides an authentic picture of this useful, but controversial institute. The author concludes that retention can be described as unfinished real right sui generis, an atypical legal real guarantee authentically exercised by self-protection technique, whose ratio legis is threefold: social, material and procedural justification. All of this finally outlines the direction of its further affirmation, i.e., the strengthening of retention in all segments of the institute, regarding: effect, content, expansion of the object, simplified conditions for establishment, as well as an increasing number of modalities.

References

Austrijski građanski zakonik, Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch from 1811. [Austrian Civil Code]. Downloaded 2023, December 10 from https://www.trans-lex.org/602100/_/austrian-civil-code/

Babić, I. (2005). Založno pravo (Stvarnopravno obezbeđenje potraživanja) [Lien (Real security of claims)]. In: Radovanov, A. (ured.) Primena novih zakona u oblasti privrede, pravosuđa i radnih odnosa [Application of new laws in the field of economy, justice and labor relations] (pp. 4–45). Novi Sad: Privredna akademija: Pravo: Udruženje pravnika Vojvodine

Bandrac, M. & Crocq P. (1995). Droit de retention, Nature juridique, Qualification de sûreté ou de garantie [Right of retaining possession, Legal nature, Qualification of security right]. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil (4), pp. 931–934

Basso, P. (2010). Il diritto di ritenzione. Milano: Giuffré Editore

Catala-Franjou, N. (1967). De la nature juridique du droit de retention [The legal nature of the right of retention]. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil (65), Paris, pp. 9–44

Colin, A. & Capitant, H. (1935). Cours élémentaire de droit civil français II [Basic course in French Civil law II]. Paris: Dalloz

Faber, W. & Lurger, B. (2011). National reports on the Transfer of Movables in Europe, Downloaded 2023, December 5 from https://www.weltbild.at/media/txt/pdf/9783866539099-028901971-national-reportson-the-transfer-of.pdf.

Faber, W. (2014). Proprietary Security Rights in Movables – European Developments: A Spotlight Approach to BOOK IX, DCFR, Juridica International, Law Review, (2), pp. 27–36

Gucunja, J. (1979). Uslovi za vršenje prava zadržavanja prema Zakonu o obligacionim odnosima [Conditions for exercising the right of retention according to the Law on Obligations]. Glasnik Аdvokatske komore Vojvodine, (9–10), pp. 17–31

Hiber, D. & Živković, M. (2015). Obezbeđenje i učvršćenje potraživanja [Securing and consolidation of claims]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet u Beogradu

Kovačević-Kuštrimović, R. & Lazić, M. (2009). Stvarno pravo [Real law]. Niš: Punta

Koziol, H. & Welser, R. (1988). Gründriss des bürgerlichen Rechts [Outline of civil law]. Wien: Manz

Laurent Aynes M. (1995). Les sûretés – la publicité fonciére [Securities – land advertising]. Paris: Dalloz

Lorenc, R. (1966). Pravo zadržanja (ius retentionis) – doktorska disertacija [Right of retaining possession – doctoral thesis]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Nacrt Zakonika o svojini i drugim stvarnim pravima Srbije iz 2011. Downloaded 2023, December 17 from https://ius.bg.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NACRT-ZAKONIKA-O-SVOJINI.pdf.

Nemački građanski zakonik, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch [German Civil Code] from 1896. Downloaded 2023, December 10 from https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/.

Oftinger, K. (1952). Kommentar zum Schweizerichen Zivilgesetzbuch [Commentary on the Swiss Civil Code]. Zürich: Schulthess.

Opšti imovinski zakonik za Knjaževinu Crnu Goru iz 1888. [General Property Code for the Principality of Montenegro]. Downloaded 2024, January 5 from https://www.harmonius.org/sr/pravni-izvori/jugoistocna-evropa/privatno-pravo/crna-gora/Opsti_imovinski_zakonik_CG.pdf

Paunović, S. (2008). Pravo zadržavanja – retencije (Ius retentionis) [Right of retention (Ius retentionis)]. Sudska praksa, (27), pp. 64–69

Pavićević, A. (2015). Pojam retencije u domaćem i uporednom pravu [The concept of retention in domestic and comparative law]. Pravni život, 64(10), pp. 505–521

Pavićević, A. (2015). Osvrt na sličnosti i razlike između zemljišnog duga i prava retencije [The review of similarities and differences between the land debt and right of retention]. Pravo, teorija i praksa, 32(7/9), pp. 25–36. Downloaded 2024, January 10 from https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0352-3713/2015/0352-37131509025P.pdf

Pavićević, A. (2016). Pravo retencije – doktorska disertacija [Right of retaining possession – doctoral thesis]. Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet Downloaded 2023, December 20 from http://phaidrakg.kg.ac.rs/o:842

Pavićević, A. (2019). Retencija u srpskom pravu i u Nacrtu okvirnih pravila u oblasti privatnog prava [Right of Retaining Possession in Serbian Law and in the Draft Common Frame of Reference]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 53(4), pp. 1287–1301 doi: 10.5937/zrpfins53-23746.

Pavićević, A. (2019). Similarities and differences between Ius Retentionis and related Institutes of Roman Law, Ius Romanum, (2), pp. 764–783. Downloaded 2023, December 5 from http://iusromanum.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/IUS_ROMANUM_2019_2_OFFICIAL.pdf

Petrić, S. (2004). Institut prava retencije u hrvatskom i usporednom pravu [Institute of Retention in Croatian and Comparative Law]. Split: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Splitu

Planojević, N. (2012). Stvarno pravo u praksi [Real law in practice]. Kragujevac: Univerzitet u Kragujevcu, Pravni fakultet

Prednacrt Građanskog zakonika Republike Srbije [Preliminary Draft of the Civil Code of the Republic of Serbia]. Downloaded 2023, December 18 from https://www.paragraf.rs/nacrti_i_predlozi/280519-prednacrtgradjanskog-zakonika-republike-srbije.html

Simler, P. & Delebecque, P. (1989). Droit civil: Les suretes; La publicite fonciére, [Civil law: Security Rights, Land advertising]. Paris: Dalloz

Srpski građanski zakonik iz 1844. [Serbian Civil Code from 1844]. Downloaded 2024, January 5 from https://www.harmonius.org/sr/pravniizvori/jugoistocna-evropa/privatno-pravo/srbija/Srpski_gradjanski_ zakonik_1844.pdf

Stanković, O. & Orlić, M. (1996). Stvarno pravo [Real law]. Beograd: Nomos

Stanković, O. & Vodinelić, V. (2007). Uvod u građansko pravo [Introduction to Civil Law]. Beograd: Nomos

Stipković, Z. (1972). Pravo retencije i neki slični instituti [The right of retention and some similar institutes]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, 22(3), pp. 285–297

Stojanović, D. (1998). Stvarno pravo [Real law]. Kragujevac: Pravni fakultet

Švajcarski građanski zakonik, Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch from 1907. [Swiss Civil Code]. Downloaded 2023, December 9 from https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/24/233_245_233/en

Tuor, P. & Schnyder, B. (1979). Das Schweizerische Zivilgesetzbuch [Swiss Civil Code]. Zürich: Schulthess

Von Bar, C. et al. (2009). Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law, Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Full Edition, Vol. 5. Downloaded 2023, December 6 from: https://www.law. kuleuven.be/personal/mstorme/2009_02_DCFR_OutlineEdition.pdf

Westermann, H. (1960). Sachenrecht. [Real law]. Karlsruhe: C. F. Müller

Zakon o izvršenju i obezbeđenju [Law on Execution and Security]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 106/15, 106/16 – autentično tumačenje, 113/17 – autentično tumačenje, 54/19, 9/20 – autentično tumačenje i 10/23 – dr. zakon

Zakon o obligacionim odnosima [Law on Obligations]. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – odluka USJ i 57/89, Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/93, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/2003 – Ustavna povelja i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/20

Zakon o osnovama svojinskopravnih odnosa [Law on the Basics of Property Relations]. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 6/80 i 36/90, Službeni list SRJ, br. 29/96 i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 115/05 – dr. zakon

Zakon o stečaju [Bankruptcy Law]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 104/09, 99/11 – dr. zakon, 71/12 – odluka US, 83/14, 113/17, 44/18 i 95/18