ARBITRAL RESOLUTIONS OF COMMERCIAL LITIGATIONS IN THE LIGHT OF UNCITRAL MODEL LAW

Miladin Pejak

Authors

Miladin Pejak A coordinator of procurement of supplies and equipment, a joint-stock company of NIS, Novi Sad

Abstract

The author points out the importance of a quality arbitral process, particularly in commercial disputes. The author analyzes the solution of UNCITRAL Model Law and order regarding the appointment of arbitrators, their characteristics, powers and limitations of arbitration, and the arbitration proceedings itself. He also indicates the direction in which it would be necessary the national legislation to be harmonized, taking into account the current world standards set out in the field of arbitration law. The author’s attitude towards the amended Model Act is quite affirmative, so he concludes that it is necessary to continue with the harmonization of national legislation, especially regarding the lessons drawn from the states with a longer and richer empirical tradition of arbitration.

References

Bardoš, B., Varadi, T., Knežević, G., (2001). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Novi Sad, Forum;

Bilbija V., (2001). Priznanje i izvršenje stranih arbitražnih odluka, Pravo – teorija i praksa,18, (12), str. 43–56;

Carić, S., (1996). Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža u SR Nemačkoj, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 13, (1–2), str. 21–24;

čolić, B., (2006). Novi Zakon o arbitaži, arbitražni sud, postupci i odluke, Pravo i privreda, 43 (8–12), str. 22–37;

David, R., (1982). L’arbitrage dans le commerce international (Arbitraža u međunarodnoj trgovini), Pariz, Economica;

Domke, (1959). Arbitration of State-trading Relations, Symposium-State Trading: Part I;

Domke, (1959). Konferencija Ujedinjenih nacija o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži;

Dukić Mijatović M., (2010). Priznanje i izvršenje arbitražnih odluka – Osvrt na izmene i dopune UNCITRAL-ovog Model Zakona o međunarodnoj trgovinskoj arbitraži, Pravna riječ, časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 2 (5), str. 173–180;

Dukić-Mijatović M., (2011). Položaj arbitra u arbitražnom postupkukomparativni pregled, Strani pravni život, (1), str. 217–227 ;

Đajić S., (2011). Vremenska nadležnost međunarodnih sudova i arbitraža, Zbornik Matice srpske za društvene nauke, (135), str. 211–230;

Knežević, G., (1999). Međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Beograd, Pravni fakultet;

Jarrosson, Ch., (1987). La notion d’arbitrage, (Pojam arbitraže). Pariz, LGDJ;

Jovičić, K., (2008). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža, Strani pravni život, (3), str. 99–121;

Jovičić, K., (2003). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža u pravu Japana Strani pravni život, (1), str. 131–145;

Lonjenfeld (1992). International litigation and arbitration, Amerikan Casebook Series, West Group;

Lonjenfeld (1993). International litigation and arbitration – Selected Treaties, Statutes and Rules, Amerikan Casebook Series, Njest Publišing Co.;

Mitrović, D., (1997). Međunarodna trgovinska arbitraža danas, Međunarodna privredna arbitraža: stanje i perspektive, Beograd, Savremena administracija;

Pak, M., (1989). Međunarodno privatno pravo, Beograd, Naučna knjiga;

Petrović M., (1996). Lex mercatoria i međunarodna trgovačka arbitraža, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 13 (3–4), str. 58–72;

Redžović N., (2011). Arbitraža, Poslovna politika, 40, (3–4), str. 40–44;

Redfern, Hunter, (1999). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, London, Sweet & Maxwell;

Rubellin-Devichi, J., (1965). L’arbitrage. Nature juridique. Droit interne et droit international privé, Pariz, LGDJ;

Šćepanović, R., (2012). Prednosti i nedostaci savremene međunarodne trgovinske arbitraže: osnovne odlike i perspektive razvoja, Pravo, teorija i praksa, 29 (1–3) str. 1–27;

Trajković, M., S., (2003). Pravna priroda trgovinske arbitraže, Pravo i privreda, 40 (5–8), str. 239–245