THE AGREEMENT ON THE RECOGNITION OF MISDEMEANOR AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN DOMESTIC LEGISLATION
Abstract
THE main idea of the institutionalization of the agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor is based on the assumption that the agreement between the parties can more easily put an end to the criminal proceedings. The agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor can be viewed in the light of reforms in the field of the Law of Delict and Criminal law having a more efficient procedure as their goal. The basic elements of this institute are the following: accepting the responsibility, willingness of the authorized applicant and legal prediction. Bearing in mind its legal effect, its elements are precisely prescribed. The agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor is not an original creation of the Law of Delict. It is taken from the criminal law, and its roots are found in the Anglo-Saxon law, where it is well- developed and widely applied. This paper shows its development in domestic legislation, its features, similarities and differences being compared with the criminal institute of recognition, as well as with the similar institutes in the Law of Delict. It includes the expectations, but also certain doubts in the term of its wider usage.
References
Bejatović, S., (2009). Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela i druge pojednostavljene forme postupanja u krivičnom procesnom zakonodavstvu Srbije kao Instrumenti normativne efikasnosti krivičnog postupka, u Zborniku „Pravni sistem Srbije i standardi Evropske unije i Saveta Evrope“ kojeg je priredio Bejatović, S., knjiga 4, Pravni fakultet u Kragujevcu, str. 85-106
Brkić, S., (2013). Krivično procesno pravo II, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.
Delibašić, V., (2015). Sporazumi javnog tužioca i okrivljenog, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu
Dervan, L., (2015), The Injustice of the plea-bargain system, The Wall Street Journal, (17.10.2015). Preuzeto sa: www.wsj.com/articles/theinjustice-of-the-plea-bargain-system 1449188034
Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Sl. list SRJ, br. 70/01
Zakon o prekršajima, Sl. glasnik R. Srbije, br. 65/13, 13/16 i 98/16– odluka US
Jovašević, D., (2012). Prekršajno pravo, Pravni fakultet u Nišu
Jovašević, D., (2013). Prekršajna odgovornost u pravu Republike Srbije, Godišnjak fakulteta pravnih nauka, Banja Luka, 3 (3), str. 47-63
Mitrović, Lj., (2013). Pojednostavljene forme postupanja u prekršajnim stvarima u Republici Srpskoj - prekršajni nalog i sporazum o sankciji, Strani pravni život, (2), str. 137-152
Seigel, T., (2016). Why do most criminal cases end with plea bargains?, Lawyers, (17.10.2015). Preuzeto sa: http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/plea-bargains-or-agreements-and-sentencing.html
Ustav Republike Srbije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 98/06
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






