THE AGREEMENT ON THE RECOGNITION OF MISDEMEANOR AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN DOMESTIC LEGISLATION

Authors

  • Slobodan Malešić The Ministry of Internal Affairs of Republic of Serbia – the assistant of the director of police

Abstract

THE main idea of the institutionalization of the agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor is based on the assumption that the agreement between the parties can more easily put an end to the criminal proceedings. The agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor can be viewed in the light of reforms in the field of the Law of Delict and Criminal law having a more efficient procedure as their goal. The basic elements of this institute are the following: accepting the responsibility, willingness of the authorized applicant and legal prediction. Bearing in mind its legal effect, its elements are precisely prescribed. The agreement on the recognition of misdemeanor is not an original creation of the Law of Delict. It is taken from the criminal law, and its roots are found in the Anglo-Saxon law, where it is well- developed and widely applied. This paper shows its development in domestic legislation, its features, similarities and differences being compared with the criminal institute of recognition, as well as with the similar institutes in the Law of Delict. It includes the expectations, but also certain doubts in the term of its wider usage.

References

Bejatović, S., (2009). Sporazum o priznanju krivičnog dela i druge pojednostavljene forme postupanja u krivičnom procesnom zakonodavstvu Srbije kao Instrumenti normativne efikasnosti krivičnog postupka, u Zborniku „Pravni sistem Srbije i standardi Evropske unije i Saveta Evrope“ kojeg je priredio Bejatović, S., knjiga 4, Pravni fakultet u Kragujevcu, str. 85-106

Brkić, S., (2013). Krivično procesno pravo II, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu.

Delibašić, V., (2015). Sporazumi javnog tužioca i okrivljenog, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe u Novom Sadu

Dervan, L., (2015), The Injustice of the plea-bargain system, The Wall Street Journal, (17.10.2015). Preuzeto sa: www.wsj.com/articles/theinjustice-of-the-plea-bargain-system 1449188034

Zakonik o krivičnom postupku, Sl. list SRJ, br. 70/01

Zakon o prekršajima, Sl. glasnik R. Srbije, br. 65/13, 13/16 i 98/16– odluka US

Jovašević, D., (2012). Prekršajno pravo, Pravni fakultet u Nišu

Jovašević, D., (2013). Prekršajna odgovornost u pravu Republike Srbije, Godišnjak fakulteta pravnih nauka, Banja Luka, 3 (3), str. 47-63

Mitrović, Lj., (2013). Pojednostavljene forme postupanja u prekršajnim stvarima u Republici Srpskoj - prekršajni nalog i sporazum o sankciji, Strani pravni život, (2), str. 137-152

Seigel, T., (2016). Why do most criminal cases end with plea bargains?, Lawyers, (17.10.2015). Preuzeto sa: http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/plea-bargains-or-agreements-and-sentencing.html

Ustav Republike Srbije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 98/06

Downloads

Published

2017-09-30

How to Cite

Malešić, S. (2017). THE AGREEMENT ON THE RECOGNITION OF MISDEMEANOR AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION IN DOMESTIC LEGISLATION. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 34(7-9), 1–15. Retrieved from https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/81