ORIENTALISM AS A FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON NUCLEAR SECURITY

Sanela Veljković

doi:10.5937/ptp2502062V

Authors

Sanela Veljković Junior Research Assistant, University of Belgrade – 'Vinča' Institute of Nuclear Sciences, National Institute of Importance for the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3650-290X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2502062V

Keywords:

nuclear orientalism, nuclear weapons, the West, Third World states

Abstract

Orientalism refers to the discursive process through which Western societies construct a spatial imaginary of the “Orient” or the East. This conceptual framework can be useful in analyzing contemporary nuclear relations. The dichotomy between nuclear powers and Third World states stems directly from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), whose provisions established which states were granted the status of nuclear powers. Consequently, all other countries—those that did not possess nuclear weapons at the time the treaty was adopted—were denied such a status. In the decades that followed, several Third World states developed their own nuclear programs, including India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, and Iran. Some of these countries never accepted the provisions of the NPT, while others later withdrew from the obligations they had undertaken. This paper investigates the role of Orientalism as a contributing factor in the development of international law on nuclear security. It analyzes how Orientalist viewpoints have shaped the formation of international legal norms, with particular emphasis on their disproportionate effects on Third World states. The paper concludes by underscoring the need to reassess existing paradigms in international relations in order to reduce geopolitical tensions and enhance global nuclear security.

References

Bakić-Hejden, M. (2006). Varijacije na temu Balkana [Variations on the Balkan theme]. Beograd: Filip Višnjić

Biswas, S. (2001). “Nuclear apartheid” as political position: race as a postcolonial resource? Alternatives, 26(4), pp. 485–522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540102600406

Biswas, S. (2002). The ‘New Cold War’: Secularism, orientalism, and postcoloniality. In: Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class (pp. 184–208). London and New York: Routledge. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://ir101.co.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2017/11/biswas-the-new-cold-war.pdf

Bubnjević, S. (2023). Alhemija bombe: prva i sveobuhvatna istorija nuklearnog doba [Alchemy of the bomb: The first and comprehensive history of the nuclear age]. Beograd: Laguna.

Duzinas, K. (2009). Ljudska prava i imperija: politička filozofija kosmopolitizma [Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik

Giri, P. (2007). Mit o nacijama: srednjovekovno poreklo Evrope [The myth of nations: The medieval origins of Europe]. Novi Sad: Cenzura

Goldblat, J. (1997). Nuclear‐weapon‐free zones: A history and assessment. The Nonproliferation Review, 4(3), pp. 18–32

Gusterson, H. (1999). Nuclear weapons and the other in the Western imagination. Cultural Anthropology, 14(1), pp. 111–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1999.14.1.111

Gusterson, H. (2006). A Double Standard on Nuclear Weapons?. MIT Center for International Studies Audit of the Conventional Wisdom, 6(8), pp. 1–5. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://cis.mit.edu/sites/default/files/images/gusterson_audit.pdf

Hrnjaz, M. (2014). Legalnost upotrebe nuklearnog oružja u oružanim sukobima: ograničenja u vezi sa zaštitom čovekove životne sredine [The legality of the use of nuclear weapons in armed conflicts: Restrictions in relation to environmental protection]. Godišnjak Fakulteta političkih nauka, 8(12), pp. 115–132. DOI: 10.5937/GodFPN1412115H

Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996. International Court of Justice; Downloaded 2025, January

from: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/95/095- 19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf

Liebl, V. (2009). India and Pakistan: competing nuclear strategies and doctrines. Comparative strategy, 28(2), pp. 154–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01495930902799731

Manojlović, S. (2009). Međunarodno pravo i dozvoljenost upotrebe atomskog oružja [International law and the legality of the use of atomic weapons]. Strani pravni život, 3, pp. 351–368. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: http://ricl.iup.rs/1275/1/document%20%2817%29.pdf

Nojman, I. (2011). Upotrebe Drugog: Istok u formiranju evropskog identiteta [Uses of the Other: The East in the Formation of European Identity]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Panofsky, W. K. (1998). Dismantling the Concept of ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’. Arms Control Today, 28(3), pp. 3–8

Putnik, N. (2022). Sajber rat i sajber mir [Cyber War and Cyber Peace]. Beograd: Inovacioni centar Fakulteta bezbednosti i Akademska misao

Raičević, N. (2000). Zone bez nuklearnog oružja [Nuclear‐weapon‐free zones]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 40(40-41), pp. 235–252

Sagan, S. D. (2011). The causes of nuclear weapons proliferation. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, pp. 225–244. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-131042

Said, E. (2008). Orijentalizam [Orientalism]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX veka

Stojanović, B. (2022). Sveobuhvatni (ne) sporazum: Iran kao nova nuklearna sila [The comprehensive (non)agreement: Iran as a new nuclear power]. Nacionalni interes, 42(2), pp. 185–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22182/ni.4222022.10

Šabanić, E. (2016). Povijest indijsko-pakistanskog sukoba [The history of the India-Pakistan conflict]. Polemos: časopis za interdisciplinarna istraživanja rata i mira, 19(37), pp. 121–136. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/250358.

Tepšić, G., & Vukelić, M. (2019). Kulturno nasilje kao proces dugog trajanja: od kolonijalizma do humanitarizma [Cultural violence as a longterm process: From colonialism to humanitarianism]. Politička Misao: Croatian Political Science Review, 56(1), pp. 109–131. DOI: 10.20901/pm.56.1.04.

Todorova, M. (2006). Imaginarni Balkan [Imagining the Balkans]. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek

Trapara, V. (2012). Perspektive nuklearnog razoružanja u svetlu protivrečnih strategija nuklearnih sila [Perspectives on nuclear disarmament in light of the contradictory strategies of nuclear powers]. Međunarodna politika, 63(1145), pp. 110–126. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: http://repozitorijum.diplomacy.bg.ac.rs/123/1/Medjunarodna%20politika%201145-2012-112-128.pdf

The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20634/volume-634-I-9068-

English.pdf

The Treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/infcircs/1970/infcirc140.pdf

Urwin, J. A. (2016). More bang for your buck: Nuclear weapons and their enactment of colonial and gendered power. The ANU Undergraduate Research Journal, 8, pp. 237–250. DOI: 10.22459/AURJ.08.2016.18.

Vukadinović, R. (2006). Nuklearno oružje u posthladnoratovskom svijetu [Nuclear weapons in the Post-Cold War World]. Međunarodne studije, 6(3), pp. 130–140. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/421383

Williams, P. (2011). Race, ethnicity and nuclear war: Representations of nuclear weapons and post-apocalyptic worlds. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press

Žirovčić, D. (2009). Bliskoistočna nuklearna enigma [The Middle Eastern nuclear enigma]. Međunarodne studije, 9(4), pp. 90–103. Downloaded 2025, January 10 from: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/421849