ENDANGERING THE PUBLIC TRAFFIC – CRIMINAL LAW REGULATION AND PRACTICAL DOUBTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2202039M

Keywords:

endangering the public traffic, criminal offenses and misdemeanors, objective condition of incrimination

Abstract

Due to their frequency and importance, traffic crimes are an important subject of theoretical study. Violation of traffic regulations is sanctioned by the norms of misdemeanor and criminal law, which makes this area complex, but also leads to certain difficulties in the interpretation and application of law. The authors thorougly analyze the legal description of the criminal offense of endangering the public transport and its qualified forms. A particular attention is paid to the the interpretation of certain subjective and objective elements of this criminal offense (consequence, mens rea and objective conditions of incrimination). The authors point out certain inconsistencies in the court practice and propose legislative changes to improve criminal protection and establish a more legitimate and pragmatic distinction between criminal and misdemeanor acts.

References

Atanacković, D. (1980). Objektivni uslovi inkriminacije u jugoslovenskom krivičnom 87zakonodavstvu. [Objective condition of incrimination in Yugoslav criminal legislation]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Mostaru, separat, 87 (3)

Banović, B. (2020). Krivično procesno pravo: posebni deo. [Criminal procedure law: special part]. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu: Fakultet bezbednosti

Grujić, G. (2020). Actiones liberae in causa. [Actiones liberae in causa]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 37 (2), pp. 112–123. DOI 10.5937/ptp2002112G

Delić, N. (2021). Krivično pravo: posebni deo. [Criminal law: special part]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu

Đorđević, Đ., & Kolarić, D. (2020). Krivično pravo: posebni deo. [Criminal law: special part]. Beograd: Kriminalističko-policijski univerzitet

Zakon o prekršajima [Misdemeanor Law], Službeni glasnik RS, br. 65/13, 13/16, 98/16 – odluka US, 91/19 i 91/19 – dr. zakon

Zakon o bezbednosti saobraćaja na putevima [Trafc Law], Službeni glasnik RS, br. 41/09, 53/10, 101/11, 32/13 – odluka US, 55/14, 96/15 – dr. zakon, 9/16 – odluka US, 24/18, 41/18, 41/18 – dr. zakon, 87/18, 23/19 i 128/20 – dr. zakon

Zakonik o krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Law], Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/11, 101/11, 121/12, 32/13, 45/13, 55/14, 35/19, 27/21– US, 62/21 – US

Kokolj, M. (1981). Actiones liberae in causa – krivična odgovornost privremeno neuračunljivih lica. [Actiones liberae in causa – criminal liability of temporary insane persons]. Mostar: Prva književna komuna

Milošević, M. (2009). Skrivljena neuračunljivost. [Actiones liberae in causa]. Godišnjak Fakulteta bezbednosti, 2 (1), pp. 343–365

Lazarević, Lj. (2011). Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. [Criminal Code Commentary]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union

Obradović, D. (2018). Stare osobe: ranjiva kategorija učesnika u saobraćaju. [Older persons as an vulnerable cathegory of trafc participants]. Pravni zapisi, 9 (2), pp. 239–254. DOI:10.5937/pravzap0-19014.

Ćorović, E., & Turanjanin, V. (2017). O skrivljenoj neuračunljivosti iz člana 24. Krivičnog zakonika Srbije. [About institute of actiones liberae in causa in Article 24 of Serbian Criminal Code]. Zbornik Instituta za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja, 36 ( 1), pp. 7–21

Zupančič, B. M. (2011). Ne bis in idem (zabrana ponovnog suđenja za isto delo): la belle dame sans merci. [Ne bis in idem (the prohibition of double jeopardy) la belle dame sans merci ]. Crimen: časopis za krivične nauke, 2 (2), pp. 171–178

Ivičević-Karas, E., & Kos, D. (2012). Primjena načela ne bis in idem u hrvatskom kaznenom pravu. [The implementation of ne bis in idem prohibition in Croatian criminal law]. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno parvo i praksu, 19 (2), pp. 555–584. URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/110872

Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2019). Krivično pravo: posebni deo. [Criminal law: special part]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union i JP Službeni glasnik

Mrvić-Petrović, N. (2014). Poštovanje načela ne bis in idem pri suđenju za slične prekršaje i krivična dela. [Respect of ne bis in idem principle of the trial for similar criminal offenses and misdemeanors]. NBP. Nauka, bezbednost, policija, 19 (2), pp. 27–39. DOI: 10.5937/NBP1402027M

Simić, I., & Trešnjev, A. (2008). Zbirka sudskih odluka iz krivičnopravne materije: sedma knjiga. [Collection of court decisions in criminal matters: the seventh book]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik

Stojanović, Z. (2018). Komentar Krivičnog zakonika. [Criminal Code Commentary]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik

Stojanović, Z., & Perić, O. (2011). Krivično pravo: posebni deo, 14. izdanje. [Criminal law: special part, 14th edition]. Beograd: Pravna knjiga

Čejović, B. (2008). Krivično pravo u sudskoj praksi, [Criminal law in court practise]. Kragujevac: Lion Mark

Vuković, I. (2021). Krivično pravo: opšti deo, drugo izmenjeno izdanje. [Criminal law: general part, the Second edition]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu

Vuković, I. (2021a). Prekršajno pravo, [Misdemeanor Law]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu

Škulić, M. (2017). Krivično procesno pravo, [Criminal procedure law]. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Milošević, M., & Banović, B. (2022). ENDANGERING THE PUBLIC TRAFFIC – CRIMINAL LAW REGULATION AND PRACTICAL DOUBTS . Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 39(2), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2202039M

Issue

Section

Original scientific work