General damages awarded for emotional distress resulting from miscarriage of justice and false imprisonment

Nenad D. Stefanovic; Goran Milojević

doi:10.5937/ptp2403090S

Authors

Nenad D. Stefanovic University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7899-9585
Goran Milojević University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-9883

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2403090S

Keywords:

non-economic damages, freedom, wrongful conviction, deprivation of liberty, detention

Abstract

Compensation for non-economic damages, the debate over its justification, and the adequacy of compensation awarded for harm to non-economic goods have been contentious issues among domestic legal theorists for decades. The provisions of the 1978 Law on Obligations resolved this debate by introducing the right to monetary compensation for non-economic damages in explicitly enumerated cases. The aim of the authors is to use appropriate scientific methods to demonstrate how failures by state authorities, specifically the police and judicial bodies, can cause non-economic damage to individuals through miscarriages of justice and false imprisonment. Freedom is a fundamental human right, guaranteed by the Constitution, laws, and ratified international documents. This raises the question of how, and to what extent, a wrongful conviction or unlawful deprivation of liberty violates this fundamental right, and what legal remedies are available to the victim. The focus of the paper will be on the legislation of the Republic of Serbia, as well as the views and interpretations in legal theory and in practice regarding the victim’s claim for monetary compensation for harm to non-economic goods, such as reputation and honor.

References

Banović B. (2019). Jemstvo kao mera obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku – norma, praksa i dosadašnja iskustva u primeni, [Bail as Measure for Securing Defendant’s Presence in Criminal Proceedings-Regulations, Case Law and Previous Experiences Gained in Enforcement]. In: Bejatović, S. (ured.), Pritvor i druge mere obezbeđenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku – međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena [Detention and other measures to ensure the presence of the accused in criminal proceedings – international legal standards, regional legislation and implementation] (pp. 201–223). Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji

Bećirović Alić, M., & Ahmatović Ljajić, A. (2018). Naknada nematerijalne štete u teoriji i sudskoj praksi Republike Srbije. [Compensation of nonmaterial damage in theory and court practice in Republic of Serbia]. Ekonomski izazovi, 7(13), pp. 140–152. https://doi.org/10.5937/EkoIzazov1813140B

Blagojević, B. T., & Krulj, V. ur. (1980) Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima. [Commentary on the Law of Obligations]. Beograd: Savremena administracija

Brkić, S. (2009). Rehabilitacija neosnovano osuđenih lica. [Rehabilitation of the unjustifiablu convicted persons]. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 81(10), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv0910409B

Džudović, M., & Prelević, S. (2009). Naknada nematerijalne štete prema Zakonu o obligacionim odnosima [Compensation for non-propertied damages]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 26(5-6), pp. 46–56

Knežević, S. (2011). Ograničavanje lične slobode zadržavanjem osumnjičenog. [Limitation of Personal Freedom by Detention of Suspect]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 45(1), pp. 167–182. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns1101167K

Ljudska prava u Srbiji 2023 – Pravo, praksa i međunarodni standardi ljudskih prava, (2024). [Human Rights in Serbia 2023 – Law, Practice, and International Human Rights Standards]. Beogradski centar za ljudska prava, Downloaded 2024, August 24 from https://www.bgcentar. org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LJudska-prava-u-Srbiji-2023-Tabakodobrenje-za-stampu-v2.pdf

Marković, M. B. (2014). Osnov odgovornosti za štetu zbog neosnovanog lišenja slobode i neosnovane osude [A legal basis for liability for damages due to wrongful deprivation of liberty and wrongful conviction]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 31(1-3), pp. 40-52

Milovanović, D. (2021). Postupak za ostvarivanje prava lica neosnovano lišenog slobode ili neosnovano osuđenog [Procedure for exercising the rights of a person wrongfully deprived of liberty or wrongfully convicted]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 60(92), pp. 259–276

Mrvić Petrović, N., & Petrović, Z. (2010). Naknada štete zbog neosnovanog lišenja slobode ili neosnovane osude u stranim zakonodavstvima [Compensation for arbitrary detention or arbitrary condemnation in the foreign laws]. Strani pravni život, (3), pp. 7–32

Opšta deklaracija o pravima čoveka [Universal Declaration of Human Rights] – adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948. Downloaded 2024, August 21 from https://ravnopravnost.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/images_files_UN_Opsta%20deklaracija%20o%20pravima%20coveka.pdf

Pravilnik o sastavu i načinu rada komisije za naknadu štete licima neosnovano lišenim slobode ili neosnovano osuđenim [Rulebook on the composition and method of work of the commission for compensation of damages to persons unjustly deprived of liberty or unjustly convicted]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 156/20

Radišić, J. (2004). Obligaciono pravo [Law of Obligations]. Beograd: Nomos

Radovanov, A. (2009). Obligaciono pravo [Law of Obligations]. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet za privredu ipravosuđe

Salma, J. (1999). Obligaciono pravo [Law of Obligations]. Novi Sad: Univerzitet u Novom sadu, Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavačku deatnost

Simović, D., & Jovašević, M. (2017). Zaštita prava neosnovano osuđenog lica i lica neosnovano lišenog slobode u krivičnom i prekršajnom pravu Republike Srbije. [Protection of rights of ill-fondedly convicted person and person groundlessly detained in criminal and petty offence legislation in the Republic of Serbia]. Srpska pravna misao – časopis za pravnu teoriju i praksu, 23(50), pp. 80–102

Stanić, M. (2019). Neophodnost određivanja pritvora i naknada štete u praksi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava – smernice za Srbiju. [Necessity of the custody and damage compensation in the case law of the European court of human rights – guidelines for Serbia]. In: Petrović, Z., & Čolović, V. (ured.), XXII Međunarodni naučni skup Prouzrokovanje štete, naknada štete i osiguranje [XXII International scientific conference Causing Damage, Damage Compensation and Insurance]. (pp. 269–281). Beograd: Institut za uporedno parvo

Ustav Republike Srbije [Constitution of Republic of Serbia]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 98/06 i 115/21) (Odluka o proglašenju Ustavnog zakona za sprovođenje Akta o promeni Ustava Republike Srbije – Amandmani I – XXIX – Službeni glasnik RS, br. 16/22)

Zakon o obligacionim odnosima [Law on Obligations]. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – odluka USJ i 57/89, Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/93, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/03 – Ustavna povelja i Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/20

Zakonik o krivičnom postupku [Criminal procedure code]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 72/11, 101/11, 121/12, 32/13, 45/13, 55/14, 35/19, 27/21 – odluka Ustavnog suda i 62/21 – odluka Ustavnog suda

Zahtev za naknadu neosnovano osuđenih i neosnovano lišenih slobode [Request for compensation for unjustly convicted and unjustly deprived of liberty]. Downloaded 2024, August 24 from: https://www.mpravde.gov.rs/tekst/15039/zahtev-za-naknadu-stete-neosnovano-osudjenih-ineosnovano-lisenih-slobode.php