THE IMPOSTANCE OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT FOR DIRECT INVESTMENTS OF FOREIGN CAPITAL

Authors

  • Zorka Grandov The Faculty of economy and engineering management, The University of Business Academy
  • Mаја Đokić Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Postgraduate course – Doctoral student in the field of Audiovisual comunications and advertising Asturias, Barcelona, Spain
  • Radica Jovanović The Faculty of entrepreneurial business, The Union University
  • Željka Ogrizović Master of Economic Sciences, Pančevo

Keywords:

Foreign Direct Investments (FDI), European transition countries, Investment environment

Abstract

Based on experiences of european transition countries, in this paper, stability of investment environment is named as the key factor regarding FDI inflow increase.

Positive impacts of Foreign direct investments (FDI) are confirmed in the most of empirical analysis. Negative effects are, on the other hand, mostly related to employment decrease due to the entry of foreign companies through the privatization process, low competitiveness of domestic enterprises comparing to forign firms, and grate share in overall import. Presense of export orientated foreign companies had the possitive impact in all cases, almost without exeptions. Optimal, principally stable investment environment, was substantially important for greenfield projects in all european transition countries.

There is no doubt that Foreign direct investments are needful and extremely important for the Republic of Serbia, especially because of the investment package consists not only of capital, but also including new technologies, management and organization knowledges, market access, etc. Unfavourably situation regarding unemployment is evident and privatization process is near the end, so investment climate have to be improved in the nearest future in order to attract greenfield investments (which include new job creations). It means that grate efforts have to be concentrate on preserving the political stability and upgrading legal safety. Possibly extension of the political crisis should have particularly negative impact on FDI flows in Serbia, not to mention that greenfield investments shouldn’t be expected under those circumstances.

References

Albuquerque Eui: The composition of international capital flows: risk sharing through FDI, Bradley Policy Research Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, 2006.

Aranđelović Z. i Petrović-Ranđelović M.: Foreign Direct Investment as a Factor of Acceleration of the Transition Process and its Role in the Process of Privatization, Economics and Organization, Vol. 3 , No. 2, 2006.

Estrin Saul and Meyer Klaus: Foreign Direct Investment in Transition Economies: Strengthening the Gains from Integration, University of Bath, 2008.

Grandov Z., Međunarodni biznis i trgovina, BTO, 2009.

Grandov Z., Međunarodna ekonomija i globalizacija, BTO, 2009.

Gross D. and Steinher A.: Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge, 2004.

Johnson Andreas: The Effects of FDI Inflows on Host Economic Growth, Jonkoping International Business School, Sweden, 2005.

Karkkainen A.: EU-15 Foreign Direct Investment in the new Member States, European Commision, 2008.

Kutan Ali M. And Vukšić Goran: Foreign Direct Investment and Export Performance: Empirical Evidence, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville and The William Davidson Institute, Michigan, 2007.

Transparency International (www.transparency.org, www.ICGG.ORG)

World Bank: Ease of Doing Business 2008.

World Investment Report 2008, UNCTAD, New York and Geneva, 2007

Downloads

Published

2010-08-31

How to Cite

Grandov, Z., Đokić, M., Jovanović, R., & Ogrizović, Željka. (2010). THE IMPOSTANCE OF THE INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT FOR DIRECT INVESTMENTS OF FOREIGN CAPITAL. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 27(7-8), 23–37. Retrieved from https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/308

Issue

Section

Original scientific work