CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNAUTHORIZED DISPOSAL OF THIRD PARTY CREDITOR ASSETS PURSUANT TO THE BANKRUPTCY LAW
Abstract
In the case of an unauthorized disposal of third party creditor assets, the third party creditor’s rights are transformed into the right of obligation – the right to compensation. If particular assets were disposed of after the initiation of a bankruptcy proceedings or during a preliminary bankruptcy proceedings, after a provisional trustee had taken office, the compensation being equal to the market value of assets shall form a part of bankruptcy assets and shall be settled with priority before the payment of the other creditors’ claims.
However, if the assets were disposed of prior to previously mentioned phases of a bankruptcy proceedings, a third party creditor may require to delegate to him the right to counter-action if it had not been effectuated, and if it had, the third party creditor has the right to compensation as an unsecured creditor from the third payment class, and his claim shall be settled by the application of a principle of proportional settlement, as a fundamental principle of a bankruptcy proceedings.
References
Ajnšpiler G., (2010). Novi Zakon o stečaju, Neka aktuelna pitanja u postupku stečaja: zbornik radova, Beograd, IP Glosarijum.
Bilbija V., (2011). Stečaj – godinu dana primene Zakona o stečaju, Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 71 (7–8), str. 389 -391.
Bilbija V., (2011). Zakonsko pravo zaloge i retencije u srpskom pravu, Pravo, teorija i praksa, 28, (4–6), str. 79–98.
Dukić Mijatović M., (2010). Vodič kroz stečajni postupak, izdanje autora, Novi Sad.
Dukić Mijatović M., (2010). Stečajno pravo, Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet Univerzitet Privredna akademija.
Dukić Mijatović M., Mirković P. (2011). Pregled zakonskih procedura stečajnih zakona u regionu u postupku ostvarivanja prava izlučnih i razlučnih poverilaca, Zbornik radova VIII tradicionalnog naučnog skupa Pravnički dani Univerziteta Privredna akademija Novi Sad, Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe str. 95–123.
Dukić Mijatović M, (2010). Osvrt na modalitete zaštite poverilaca u stečaju u svetlu Zakona o stečaju, Zbornik radova VII tradicionalnog naučnog skupa Zlatiborski dani prava, Novi Sad, Univerzitet Privredna akademija: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe, str. 339–375.
Dukić Mijatović M., (2013). Pravni položaj poverilaca obezbeđenih potraživanja u finansijskom restruktuiranju i stečaju, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 30, (1–3), str. 1–13.
Đorđević Ž., Stanković V., (1987). Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, Naučna njiga.
Jovanović Zattila M., V. čolović V., (2007). Stečajno pravo, Dosije, Beograd.
Kozar V., (2011). Komentar Zakona o parničnom postupku, sa sudskom praksom i registrom pojmova, Beograd, Poslovni biro d.o.o.
Kozar V., (2011). Šteta i druge pravne posledice neovlašćenog otuđenja predmeta izlučnog prava, Pravni informator, (6), str. 34 – 40.
Kozar V., (2010). Komentar stečajnih zakona, Beograd, Poslovni biro.
Kozar V., (2010). Ništavost ugovora o javnoj nabavci, Pravo, teorija i praksa, 27(7–8), str. 5–22.
Kozar V., Počuča M., (2011). Šteta u stečajnom postupku, u: Zdravko Petrović (urednik), Osiguranje, naknada štete i novi građanski sudski postupci: međunarodni naučni skup, Beograd, Intermex, str. 144 – 156.
Kozar V., Petrović Z., Počuča M., (2010). Zastupanje pravnih lica u sudskim postupcima (Privredno procesno pravo), Beograd, Poslovni biro.
Perović S., (1986). Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, NIU Službeni list SFRJ.
Slijepčević D., Spasić S., (2006). Komentar Zakona o stečajnom postupku, Beograd, Ces Mecon.
Stanković Orlić, (1986). Stvarno pravo, Beograd, Naučna Knjiga.
čolović V., Milijević N., (2004). Stečajni postupak, Banja Luka, Udruženje pravnika Republike Srpske.
Sudska praksa, Softverski paket za pravnike, (2011). Beograd, Intermex.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
