REVIEW OF THE DEFINITION OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IN CASE-LAW OF THE AD HOC TRIBUNALS

Bojan Budiša; Joko Dragojlović; Branislav Babić

doi:10.5937/ptp2304073B

Authors

Bojan Budiša PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5860-1719
Joko Dragojlović Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4713-1855
Branislav Babić Ministry of Internal Affairs, Kikinda, Serbia https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4561-5321

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2304073B

Keywords:

crime against humanity, ad hoc tribunals, Rome Statute

Abstract

Crime against humanity is one of the oldest international crimes, sanctioned by the international community since the early twentieth century. Throughout the twentieth century, the concept of this international crime has evolved, and its definition and scope have undergone changes from the Nuremberg Tribunal, through ad hoc international tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda, up to the Statute of the International Criminal Court. However, ever since the first codification of this international crime, there has been a challenge in fully determining it. This is evident from continuous efforts at the United Nations to adopt a comprehensive special convention that will codify all rules related to crimes against humanity. This paper will demonstrate the development of the definition of crimes against humanity through statutory prescriptions in the statutes and jurisprudence of ad hoc tribunals and the International Criminal Court, which have significantly influenced the definition of crimes against humanity.

References

Bassiouni, M. (2008). International Criminal Law, Multilateral and Bilateral Enforcement Mechanisms. Boston: Brill Nijhoff

Bassiouni, M. C., (1994). Crimes against Humanity – The Need for a Specialized Convention. Colombia Journal of Transnational Law, 31(3), pp. 457-494

Bassiouni, M.C,. (2010). Crimes Against Humanity: The Case for a Specialized Convention. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 9(4), pp. 575-593

Cassese, A. (2008). International Criminal Law. Oxford: OxfordUniversity

Dadrian, V. (1996). The History of the Armenian genocide: ethnic conflict from the Balkans to Anatolia to the Caucasus. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books

Draft articles on Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity, Downloaded September 11 from https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft_articles/7_7_2019.pdf

Đorđević, G. (2014). Odgovornost za međunarodna krivična dela – doktorska disertacija [Responsibility for international crimes – doctoral thesis]. Niš: Pravni fakultet

Galand, A. (2019). UN Security Council Referrals to the International Criminal Court – Legal Nature, Effects and Limits. Boston: Brill Nijhoff

Ivanišević, B., Ilić, G., Višnjić, T. & Janjić V. (2008). Vodič kroz Haški tribunal – propisi i praksa [Guide through The Hague Tribunal – statutes and case-law]. Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji

Kittichaisaree, K. (2001). International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University

Lopičić, J. (1998). Metodika dokazivanja ratnih zločina sa osvrtom na Nirnberški sud [Methodology for giving evidences of war crimes with retrospect to Nuremberg court]. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 15(12), pp. 57-64

Ntoubandi, F. (2007). Amnesty for Crimes Against Humanity under International Law. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff

Orakhelashvili, A. (2008). Peremptory Norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University

Rome Statute of International Criminal Court, Hague: International Criminal Court, Downloaded September 15 from https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/RS-Eng.pdf

Schabas, W. (2000). Genocide in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Schabas, W. (2007). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University

Schabas, W. (2008). State Policy as an Element of International Crimes. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98(3), pp. 953-982

Security Council resolution 827 [On establishment of the International Tribunal for Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991], S/RES/827(1993)

Security Council resolution 955 [on establishment of an International Tribunal for Rwanda and adoption of the Statute of the Tribunal], S/RES/955(1994)

Sharf, M. (2019). How the Tadic Appeals Chamber Decision Fundamentally Altered Customary International Law. In: Sterio, M., et al. (eds.) The Legacy of Ad Hoc Tribunals in International Criminal Law: Assessing the ICTY’s and the ICTR’s Most Significant Legal Accomplishments (pp. 59-72), Cambridge: Cambridge University, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108277525.005

Stanojević, P., Pavlović, Z., & Prelević, S. (2009). Međunarodni krivični sud – mlad organ, ali značajan segment međunarodnog pravosuđa [International Criminal Court – Young but important part of international justice]. Pravo teorija i praksa, 26(7-8), pp. 5-14

Šurlan, Т., (2011). Zločin protiv čovečnosti u međunarodnom krivičnom pravu [Crime against humanitz in international criminal law]. Beograd: Službeni glasnik

Wald, P. (2007). Genocide and Crime against Humanity. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 6(3), pp. 621-633