PROFILING OF ONLINE PEDOPHILES

Željko Bjelajac; Aleksandar Filipovic

doi:10.5937/ptp2204030B

Authors

Željko Bjelajac The Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary, The University of Business Academy, Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-8779
Aleksandar Filipovic The Faculty of Economics and Engineering Management, The University of Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1097-2079

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2204030B

Keywords:

pedophilia, online pedophiles, profiling, treatment of pedophiles

Abstract

Paraphilias represent a group of disorders characterized by a pathological sexual tendency or anomaly, with the impulses including intense sexual fantasies and urges that keep returning in regard to the unusual objects, activities, circumstances, and/or certain category such as the children. Pedophilia belongs to this group of disorders and it is alternatively labeled as a pedophile disorder, which includes specific incriminated actions, which in addition to prison sentences, generally result in a social stigmatization of not only perpetrators but victims too. It is a sexual affinity disorder mostly found in adults who have expressed sexual fantasies and a tendency to enter the sexual relations with children of the same or the opposite sex. Nowadays, a “digital space” has become a unique environment where these specific crimes take place, and the border between the virtual and real world is practically indistinguishable. In this digital environment, pedophiles and other sexual predators have got a new space in which they establish spontaneous contacts with potential victims (often with children). In a manipulative way, they recruit vulnerable individuals with the aim of various forms of abuse and sexual exploitation. Considering the fact that it is a delicate and variable disorder, which calls for an interdisciplinary approach, profiling these persons is crucial in relation to any countermeasure. Profiling is also necessary to systematically investigate the symptoms, nature, and factors of psychopathological conditions and deviations in the existences of the affected persons. After all, it is one of the ways of reaction to make pedophilia more visible as a part of preventive programs before the late manifestation. In this paper, there are applied the methods of a quantitative and qualitative content analysis, comparative analysis (reaction to pedophilia) as well as a descriptive and analytical statistics. The purposeful goal is to recognize pedophilia as a sociopathological phenomenon that requires an adequate response from the social community.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Downloaded 2022 Jun 15 from https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

B92. (2010). Kako prepoznati pedofila? [How to recognize a pedophile?]. Downloaded 2022, September 10 from https://www.b92.net/zdravlje/mentalno_zdravlje.php?yyyy=2010&mm=06&dd=01&nav_id=435488

Beech, A. R. & Mitchell, I. J. (2005). A neurobiological perspective on attachment problems in sexual offenders and the role of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in the treatment of such problems, Clinical Psychol. Rev. 25 (2), pp. 153–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.10.002

Beech, A. R., Elliott, I .A., Birgden, A., & Findlater, D. (2008) The Internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13 (3), pp. 216–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.03.007

Bjelajac, Ž. (2020). Fenomenološka i etiološka obeležja pedofilije. [Phenomenological and etiological attributes of pedophilia], Kultura polisa 17 (1), pp. 11–28

Bjelajac, Ž. & Filipović, A. (2020a). Perspektive zaštite dece od zloupotreba na internetu [Perspectives of child protection from Internet misuse], Kultura polisa, 17 (41), pp. 259–271

Bjelajac, Ž. Đ. & Filipović. A. M. (2020b). Internet i društvene mreže kao neograničeni prostor za koncentraciju i multiplicirano prisustvo pedofila [The internet and social networks as unlimited space for concentration and multiplied presence of pedophiles], Kultura polisa, 17 (1), pp. 29–40

Bjelajac, Ž. & Filipović, A. (2021a). Specific characteristics of digital violence and digital crime, Pravo – teorija i praksa, 38 (4), pp. 16–32, https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2104016B

Bjelajac, Ž. Đ. & Filipović, A. M. (2021b). Fleksibilnost digitalnih medija za manipulativno delovanje seksualnih predatora [Flexibility of digital media for manipulative activities of sexual predators], Kultura polisa, 18 (44), pp. 51–67, https://doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2021.18.1r.2.01

Bjelajac, Ž., Merdović, B. & Banović, B. (2020). Paedophilia: Prevalence, situation, and perspectives of treatment. NBP – Journal of Criminalistics and Law, 25 (3), pp. 17–29

Blanchard, R., Kolla, N. J., Cantor, J. M., Klassen, P. E., Dickey, R., Kuban, M. E., & Blak, T. (2007). IQ, Handedness, and Pedophilia in Adult Male Patients Stratified by Referral Source. Sexual Abuse, 19 (3), pp. 285–309 https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900307

Ferreira, K. A. (2014). Protecting Our Children in Cyberspace. Selfpublished e-book

Freund, K., Watson, R. & Dickey, R. (1990). Does sexual abuse in childhood cause pedophilia: An exploratory study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19 (6), pp. 557–568, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542465

Informacija, (2020). Microsoft ima novi alat za otkrivanje i prijavljivanje pedofila na internetu [Microsoft has a new tool for detection and reporting Internet pedophiles]. Downloaded 2021, September 13 from https://www.informacija.rs/Vesti/Microsoft-ima-novi-alat-za-otkrivanjei-prijavljivanje-pedofila-na-internetu.html

Jespersen, A. F., Lalumière, M. L., & Seto, M. C. (2009). Sexual abuse history among adult sex offenders and non-sex offenders: a meta-analysis. Child abuse & neglect, 33 (3), pp. 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.004

Psihoterapijsko savetovalište Sinteza, (2015). Antisocijalni poremećaj [Antisocial disorder]. Downloaded 2021, September 14 from http://www.psihoterapija.org.rs/antisocijalni_poremecaj.htm

Psychology Today. (2022). Pedophilia. Downloaded 2021, September 4 from https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/conditions/pedophilia/

Roeder, M. (2014). Unnatural Selection: Why the Geeks Will Inherit the Earth, Arcade Publishing

Schiffer, B., Peschel, T., Paul, T., Gizewski, E., Forsting, M., Leygraf, N., Schedlowski, M., & Krueger, T. H. (2007). Structural brain abnormalities in the frontostriatal system and cerebellum in pedophilia. Journal of psychiatric research, 41 (9), pp. 753–762, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2006.06.003

Scott, C. L., & Holmberg, T. (2003). Castration of sex offenders: prisoners’ rights versus public safety. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31 (4), pp. 502–509

Tenbergen, G., Wittfoth, M., Frieling, H., Ponseti, J., Walter, M., Walter, H., Beier, K. M., Schiffer, B., & Kruger, T. H. (2015). The Neurobiology and Psychology of Pedophilia: Recent Advances and Challenges. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9, p. 344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00344

World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. World Health Organization. Downloaded 2021, September 6 from https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en

Žunić-Cicvarić, J. & Kalajdžić, K. (2021). Vodič za digitalnu bezbednost mladih – zaštita privatnosti i sprečavanje digitalnog nasilja [Guide for digital safety of youth – protection of privacy and prevention of digital violence]. Beograd: Beogradska otvorena škola