ALGORITHMIC CONTRACTS IN MODERN CONTRACT LAW – CONCEPT, LEGAL NATURE, AND FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL ISSUES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2603001M

Keywords:

algorithmic contracts, contract law, digital society, electronic contract, smart contract, automation of contracting

Abstract

The development of digital technologies has led to noticeable changes in the manner in which contracts are concluded and performed. Within this framework, algorithmic contracts have emerged as one of the forms of contemporary contracting. The subject matter of this paper is the analysis of algorithmic contracts in modern contract law, with particular emphasis on their concept, legal nature, and relationship to the traditional contract, the electronic contract, and the smart contract. The aim of the paper is to determine whether algorithmic contracts constitute a new legal institution or merely a specific form of contemporary contracting based on the application of digital technology, as well as to identify the fundamental legal issues arising in connection with their conclusion and performance. The paper is theoretical in nature and is based on the normative and comparative legal methods, along with an analysis of relevant domestic and foreign literature and legal sources. The main hypothesis of the paper is that algorithmic contracts do not constitute a separate and autonomous legal institution, but rather a specific form of contemporary contracting in which the existing rules of contract law continue to apply, subject to certain particularities arising from the use of digital technology and automation. The analysis shows that algorithmic contracts do not fall outside the framework of the general rules of contract law, but that there are certain distinctions of a qualitatively legal nature relating to issues of consent, attribution of decision-making, control over performance, and liability for the outcome of the automated process. Their significance, therefore, does not lie in the creation of a new branch of contract law, but in the fact that they clearly reveal the limits of the existing one.

References

Coglianese, C., & Lampmann, E. (2021). Contracting for algorithmic accountability. Administrative Law Review Accord, 6, pp. 175–199. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://administrativelawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/10/Coglianese-Lampmann_ForACCORD-1.pdf?utm

Cvetković, M. S. (2023). Pametni ugovori 2.0: Ugovaranje u praksi [Smart Contracts 2.0: Contracting in Practice]. In: Odgovornost u pravnom i društvenom kontekstu – Knj. 3 [Liability in the Legal and Social Context – Book 3] (pp. 207–229). Niš: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://www.prafak.ni.ac.rs/files/centar_pub/Tematski-Zbornik-Radova-Odgovornost-2023.pdf

Cvetković, P. (2021). Ugovor kao algoritam – uvodna razmatranja [Contract as an Algorithm: Introductory Considerations]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 60(92), pp. 15–34. DOI: 10.5937/zrpfn0-34462 Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://www.prafak.ni.ac.rs/files/zbornik/sadrzaj/zbornici/z92/01z92.pdf

Durovic, M., & Lech, F. (2019). The enforceability of smart contracts. The Italian Law Journal, 5(2), pp. 493–511. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://theitalianlawjournal.it/data/uploads/5-italj-2-2019/493-durovic-lech.pdf?utm

European Bank for Reconstruction and Development [EBRD] (2018). Smart contracts: Legal framework and proposed guidelines for lawmakers. Downloaded 2026, May 5 from https://www.ebrd.com/content/dam/ebrd_dxp/assets/pdfs/legal-reform/financial-law/Smart-contracts-legalframework-and-proposed-guidelines-for-lawmakers.pdf

Linarelli, J. (2022). A Philosophy of Contract Law for Artificial Intelligence: Shared Intentionality. In: Ebers, M., Poncibò, C., & Zou M. (eds.), Contracting and Contract Law in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 59–80). London: Hart Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3876606

Oliver, M. (2021). Contracting by artificial intelligence: Open offers, unilateral mistakes, and why algorithms are not agents. ANU Journal of Law and Technology, 2, pp. 45–86. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://search.informit.org/doi/pdf/10.3316/informit.20220516066960

Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on harmonised rules on fair access to and use of data (Data Act). Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32023R2854

Scholz, L. H. (2017). Algorithmic contracts. Stanford Technology Law Review, 20, pp. 128–169. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://ir.law.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1615&context=articles

Sklaroff, J. M. (2017). Smart contracts and the cost of inflexibility. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 166(1), pp. 263–303 Downloaded 2026, May 1 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID3073133_code2754127.pdf?abstractid=3008899&mirid=1&utm

Stojšić Dabetić, J., & Mirković, P. (2022). Ugovaranje i ugovorno pravo u digitalnom društvu [Contracting and Contract Law in the Digital Society]. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe. Downloaded 2026,May 10 from https://www.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/downloads/naucnirad/projekti/publikacije_prpsdd/UGOVARANJE_I_UGOVORNO_PRAVO_U_SAVREMENOM_DIGITALNOM_DRUSTVU.pdf

Stojšić Dabetić, J., & Mirković, P. (2023). Contracting in modern digital society – Phenomenological and legal outlines. In: Vesik, T. (ed.), VII International scientific conference Development of science in the XXI century (pp. 34–42). Dortmund. Downloaded 2026, May 3 from https://conference-w.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Ger.D-1415092023.pdf

Stojšić Dabetić, J., & Mirković, P. (2024). Contracting in the digital society – Certain issues of significance in regards to regulation of offers and acceptance of offers in e-contracts. Kultura polisa, 21(1), pp. 181–201. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1241458

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law [UNCITRAL] (2024). UNCITRAL model law on automated contracting. United Nations. Downloaded 2026, May 4 from https://uncitral.un.org/sites/default/files/2424674e-mlautomatedcontracting-rev1-ebook.pdf

Wendehorst, C. (2024). Discussion draft: Principles for AI in contracting (Version 2.1). Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 13(1), pp. 43–60. Downloaded 2026, May 10 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4704081&utm

Zakon o elektronskoj trgovini [Law on Electronic Commerce]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 41/09, 95/13 i 52/19

Zakon o elektronskom dokumentu, elektronskoj identifikaciji i uslugama od poverenja u elektronskom poslovanju [Law on Electronic Document, Electronic Identification and Trust Services for Electronic Transactions]. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 94/17 i 52/21

Zakon o obligacionim odnosima [Law on Obligations]. Službeni list SFRJ, br. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 i 57/89; Službeni list SRJ, br. 31/93, Službeni list SCG, br. 1/03, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/20

Published

2026-10-09

How to Cite

Malović, V., & Mirković, P. (2026). ALGORITHMIC CONTRACTS IN MODERN CONTRACT LAW – CONCEPT, LEGAL NATURE, AND FUNDAMENTAL LEGAL ISSUES. Law - Theory and Practice, 43(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp2603001M

Issue

Section

Original scientific work

Most read articles by the same author(s)