CONCURRENCE BETWEEN THE FORM OF THE OFFENSE OF DOCUMENT FORGERY AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE OFFENCE OF DOCUMENT FORGERY WITH THE OTHER KINDS OF OFFENSE

Authors

  • Milovan Komnenić The Doctor of Law, a lawyer, Belgrade
  • Željko Bjelajac The Faculty of Law, Novi Sad
  • Žaklina Spalević The Faculty of Law of Business Academy, Novi Sad

Abstract

In addition to forgery crimes which attack the legal traffic, its smooth, normal and safe operation of our law there are other offenses that are in various ways related (or relative) to them. A forged document serves only as a means to an end. It is a crime that is never self aimed. Frequent motives for carrying out the other crimes along with falsifying documents are: greed for money, the desire to acquire a better job covering up another crime, such cases require the need to devote a particular attention to the relationship problems. Therefore, the relationship of the document forgery offense with the other offenses will be seen through the concurrence of criminal offense of document forgery and through its relationship with the other crimes.

References

Atanacković, D., (1985). Krivično pravo: posebni deo, Beograd, Pravni fakultet

Bilten Okružnog suda u Beogradu, 4/1998.

Bilten sudske prakse Vrhovnog suda Srbije, Beograd, 4/1993; 1–2/1988.

Jovašević, D., (1996). Falsifikovanje isprava: teorija i praksa, Zadužbina Andrejević

Komnenić M., Bjelajac, Ž., Spalević, Ž., (2012). Predmet krivičnog dela falsifikovanje isprave, Pravo – teorija i praksa 34 (4–6), str. 89–108.

Lazarević, Lj., (1969). Falsifikat iz čl. 306 KZ i njegov odnos prema nekim drugim krivičnim delima, Naša zakonitost, Zagreb, (1–2)

Nešić, Lj., (1989). Osvrt na krivična dela falsifikovanja i njihov odnos prema nekim drugim krivičnim delima, Bezbednost, (4)

Stojanović, Z., Perić, O., (2007). Krivično pravo: posebni deo, Beograd, Pravni fakultet

Tahović, J., (1961). Krivično pravo: posebni deo, Beograd, Savremena administracija

Čejović, B., (2008). Krivično pravo u sudskoj praksi: posebni deo, Kragujevac, Lion

Vodinelić, V., (1963). Metodika isleđivanja falsifikata isprava, Bezbednost, (3)

Vuković, S., (2002). Komentar krivičnog zakona RS, Beograd, Službeni list

Zlatarić, B., (1958). Krivični zakonik u praktičnoj primeni, Drugi svezak, Zagreb, Informator

Živanović, T., (1936). Osnovi Krivičnog prava Kraljevine Jugoslavije: posebni deo, Druga knjiga, 2 sveska, Beograd

Codice penale, Note, rishiami e indisi a cura di Sofo borghase, Giudici del Tribunale di Milano, Milano, 1952

Francuski Krivični Zakonik od 1994 godine.

Krivični Zakonik Austrije, (1984). Strafesetz buch, St 61, sa objašnjenjima dr Foreggera dr Eugen Serinja, Wien

Krivični zakonik Republike Nemačke sa Uvodnim zakonom za Krivični zakonik i Vojni krivični zakon, (1998). Beograd

Krivični zakonik Kraljevine Švedske, autor prevoda – Zlatarić, B., (1967). 1. izd. Beograd, Institut za kriminološka i kriminalistička istraživanja

Downloads

Published

2012-09-30

How to Cite

Komnenić, M., Bjelajac, Željko, & Spalević, Žaklina. (2012). CONCURRENCE BETWEEN THE FORM OF THE OFFENSE OF DOCUMENT FORGERY AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE OFFENCE OF DOCUMENT FORGERY WITH THE OTHER KINDS OF OFFENSE. Pravo - Teorija I Praksa, 29(7-9), 99–114. Retrieved from https://casopis.pravni-fakultet.edu.rs/index.php/ltp/article/view/231

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 7-9 (2012): Pravo - teorija i praksa

Section

Review paper

License

Copyright (c) 2012 University Business Academy in Novi Sad Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>